GeForce RTX 4090 D vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Place in the ranking	375	15
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	14.07
Power efficiency	64.52	12.07
Architecture	no data	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	28 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	14592
Core clock speed	no data	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	1,149
Floating-point processing power	no data	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	176
TMUs	no data	456
Tensor Cores	no data	456
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	no data	24 GB
Memory bus width	no data	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	no data	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−400%

60−65
+400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

26.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −422%	240−250 +422%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	14 −400%	70−75 +400%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −414%	190−200 +414%
Metro Exodus	10 −400%	50−55 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −414%	180−190 +414%
Valorant	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −422%	240−250 +422%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Dota 2	13 −400%	65−70 +400%
Far Cry 5	18 −428%	95−100 +428%
Fortnite	75−80 −406%	400−450 +406%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −400%	60−65 +400%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −414%	190−200 +414%
Grand Theft Auto V	6 −400%	30−33 +400%
Metro Exodus	7 −400%	35−40 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −390%	500−550 +390%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −414%	180−190 +414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −412%	220−230 +412%
Valorant	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%
World of Tanks	180−190 −414%	950−1000 +414%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −422%	240−250 +422%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Dota 2	25 −420%	130−140 +420%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −419%	270−280 +419%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −414%	190−200 +414%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −390%	500−550 +390%
Valorant	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −424%	110−120 +424%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −392%	600−650 +392%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
World of Tanks	95−100 −405%	500−550 +405%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −429%	180−190 +429%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −429%	180−190 +429%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Valorant	35−40 −414%	180−190 +414%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Dota 2	24−27 −420%	130−140 +420%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −420%	130−140 +420%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −412%	210−220 +412%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −420%	130−140 +420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Dota 2	24−27 −420%	130−140 +420%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −428%	95−100 +428%
Fortnite	16−18 −400%	80−85 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%
Valorant	14−16 −400%	75−80 +400%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.13	69.61
Recency	30 March 2021	28 December 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	425 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 2733.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 430.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.