GeForce GT 220 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with GeForce GT 220, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
15.71
+2705%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 2705% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3191173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99
Current priceno data$121 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speedno data625 MHz
Number of transistorsno data486 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data9.840
Floating-point performanceno data144 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GT 220 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data6.6" (16.8 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data790 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataVGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−50%
21
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Hitman 3 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Hitman 3 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 5 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GT 220 compete in popular games:

  • GT 220 is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.71 0.56
Recency 30 March 2021 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 58 Watt

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 220 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 700 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.