Arc B580 vs UHD Graphics 605

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 605 with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 605
2017
5 Watt
1.01

Arc B580 outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by a whopping 3337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1084116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.08
Power efficiency16.0314.50
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5BMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442560
Core clock speed200 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors189 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate13.50427.2
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs380
TMUs18160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data456.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 605 1.01
Arc B580 34.71
+3337%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 605 453
Arc B580 15509
+3324%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−942%
125
+942%
1440p24
−183%
68
+183%
4K15
−180%
42
+180%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.99
1440pno data3.66
4Kno data5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−6767%
206
+6767%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5500%
112
+5500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
Battlefield 5 0−1 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
Fortnite 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2300%
140−150
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1544%
140−150
+1544%
Valorant 30−35
−588%
220−230
+588%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3267%
101
+3267%
Battlefield 5 0−1 120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−969%
270−280
+969%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4000%
82
+4000%
Dota 2 7
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
Fortnite 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2300%
140−150
+2300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−10500%
106
+10500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1544%
140−150
+1544%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4620%
236
+4620%
Valorant 30−35
−588%
220−230
+588%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3750%
77
+3750%
Dota 2 7
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2300%
140−150
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1544%
140−150
+1544%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1
−8400%
85
+8400%
Valorant 30−35
−588%
220−230
+588%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−4200%
250−260
+4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 2−3
−12500%
250−260
+12500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10900%
110
+10900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 30−33
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−420%
78
+420%
Valorant 6−7
−3683%
220−230
+3683%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 30
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 149
+0%
149
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 605 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 942% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 183% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 180% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 12500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is ahead in 36 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 34.71
Recency 11 December 2017 16 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 190 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 3700% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 3336.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 847 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 551 vote

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 605 or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.