UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 620
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.87

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 418% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1132661
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency12.0120.75
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96256
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.80020.80
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87
UHD Graphics 750 4.51
+418%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+419%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−400%
50−55
+400%
1440p1
−400%
5−6
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 6
−217%
18−20
+217%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Dota 2 2
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 4
−475%
21−24
+475%
Fortnite 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 6
−217%
18−20
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11
−255%
35−40
+255%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
World of Tanks 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Dota 2 7
−400%
35−40
+400%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Forza Horizon 4 4
−375%
18−20
+375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−255%
35−40
+255%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
World of Tanks 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Valorant 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Valorant 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Elden Ring 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 400% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 750 is 400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 28 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.87 4.51
Recency 11 December 2017 30 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 200% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 418.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 7600G Radeon HD 7600G
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 8310E Radeon HD 8310E
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 3634 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 401 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.