Radeon RX 550 640SP vs Titan X Pascal

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.88no data
Power efficiency9.42no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Baffin
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)13 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584640
Core clock speed1417 MHz1019 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1071 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate342.942.84
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS1.371 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs22440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 13 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 60 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 550 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and Radeon RX 550 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP
Radeon RX 550 640SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 2995 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.