GeForce 8800 GT vs HD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 and GeForce 8800 GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
3.04
+155%

HD Graphics P630 outperforms 8800 GT by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7691060
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiency14.230.67
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)29 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192112
Core clock speed350 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate26.4033.60
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno dataSingle Slot
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics P630 3.04
+155%
8800 GT 1.19

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198
+156%
8800 GT 468

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Valorant 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Valorant 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Valorant 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Valorant 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Valorant 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 1.19
Recency 5 August 2016 29 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has a 155.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 239.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8800 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9
19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3
618 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P630 or GeForce 8800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.