Quadro 4000 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregated performance score

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.98
+161%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Quadro 4000 by 161% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking415664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data0.49
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)2 November 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199
Current priceno data$295 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96256
Core clock speedno data475 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data142 Watt
Texture fill rateno data15.20
Floating-point performanceno data486.4 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2808 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data89.86 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 9.98 3.82
Recency 15 August 2020 2 November 2010
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Quadro 4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 173 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.