FirePro D500 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with FirePro D500, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.04

D500 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.76
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961536
Core clock speedno data725 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data274 Watt
Texture fill rateno data69.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.227 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data243.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.04 10.83
Recency 15 August 2020 18 January 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro D500, on the other hand, has a 7.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and FirePro D500.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while FirePro D500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 20 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.