Arc Pro A30M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.04

Arc Pro A30M outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.19
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.04 15.20
Recency 15 August 2020 8 August 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm

Arc Pro A30M has a 51.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.