GeForce MX250 vs Tesla T10

Place in performance ranking	150	547
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.35
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	TU102	N17S-G2
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	no data	20 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$33	$1165

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	384
Core clock speed	no data	1518 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1582 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	10/25 Watt
Texture fill rate	449.3	24.91

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla T10 and GeForce MX250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	13 GB/s	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	624.0 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	7.5	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla T10 32.76
+422%

GeForce MX250 6.27

Tesla T10 outperforms GeForce MX250 by 422% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla T10 12650
+422%

GeForce MX250 2422

Tesla T10 outperforms GeForce MX250 by 422% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

120−130
+422%

−422%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+600%

2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 +533%	3−4 −533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +550%	2−3 −550%
Battlefield 5	21 +425%	4−5 −425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 +500%	3−4 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry 5	22 +450%	4−5 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 +440%	5−6 −440%
Forza Horizon 4	31 +520%	5−6 −520%
Hitman 3	16 +433%	3−4 −433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	37 +429%	7−8 −429%
Metro Exodus	25 +525%	4−5 −525%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +460%	5−6 −460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	29 +480%	5−6 −480%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	13 +550%	2−3 −550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Battlefield 5	17 +467%	3−4 −467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	17 +467%	3−4 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	19 +533%	3−4 −533%
Far Cry New Dawn	17 +467%	3−4 −467%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +438%	8−9 −438%
Hitman 3	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	115 +448%	21−24 −448%
Metro Exodus	18 +500%	3−4 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21 +425%	4−5 −425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	22 +450%	4−5 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 +425%	4−5 −425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	71 +492%	12−14 −492%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	13 +550%	2−3 −550%
Forza Horizon 4	16 +433%	3−4 −433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16 +433%	3−4 −433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +433%	3−4 −433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 +500%	2−3 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+500%

3−4
−500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

+450%

2−3
−450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1