NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Tesla M60
NVIDIA Quadro K5200

General info

Comparison of Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Release date
30 August 2015
22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
Price now
no data

Technical specs

Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
557 MHz
667 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
771 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
300 Watt
150 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
2x 4,833 gflops
3,553 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
267 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin


Parameters of memory installed on Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
8 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.4 GB/s
192.3 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200.
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API support

APIs supported by Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200, sometimes including their particular versions.
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Tesla M60 32.07 +28.1%
Quadro K5200 25.04


Tesla M60 6923 +21.7%
Quadro K5200 5688

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 +0%
4541 +0%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 +0%
4541 +0%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
432 Mh/s +91.2%
226 Mh/s −91.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla M60

28.1% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (30 August 2015 vs 22 July 2014)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K5200

More pipelines (2304 vs 2048)
Higher memory bandwidth (192.3 vs 160.4 GB/s)
Less power hungry (150 vs 300 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

So, Tesla M60 or Quadro K5200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Tesla M60.
Should you still have questions on choice between Tesla M60 and Quadro K5200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Tesla M60
NVIDIA Quadro K5200

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Tesla M60 or Quadro K5200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.