Radeon RX 7600M XT vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
NVS 300 NVS 310 NVS 315 NVS 510 NVS 810
VS
Radeon RX 5500M Radeon RX 6500M Radeon RX 6550M Radeon RX 6600M Radeon RX 6650M Radeon RX 6800M Radeon RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 810 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

NVS 810
2015
2 GB DDR3, 68 Watt
3.06

RX 7600M XT outperforms NVS 810 by a whopping 1025% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

NVS 810 NVS 810
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking767149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1319.98
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed902 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06316.0
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 810 3.06
RX 7600M XT 34.44
+1025%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1180
RX 7600M XT 13288
+1026%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1110%
121
+1110%
1440p5−6
−1080%
59
+1080%
4K2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+0%
131
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
+0%
139
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 237
+0%
237
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+0%
114
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 208
+0%
208
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85
+0%
85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
+0%
140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+0%
180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
+0%
60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+0%
62
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+0%
67
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+0%
120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+0%
32
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+0%
30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+0%
22
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how NVS 810 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 1110% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 1080% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 1550% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.06 34.44
Recency 4 November 2015 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 120 Watt

NVS 810 has 76.5% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 1025.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
A2 A2
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
vs
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.