GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Tesla M40 24 GB

Place in performance ranking	187	40
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	32.71	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GM200	GN21-X11
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	10 November 2015 (8 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$250	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	9728
Boost clock speed	1112 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	213.5	515.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M40 24 GB and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6 GB/s	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 −102%	182 +102%
1440p	65−70 −109%	136 +109%
4K	40−45 −115%	86 +115%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.92	53.46
Recency	10 November 2015	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt