GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2090 with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2090
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.50

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms Tesla M2090 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking433279
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.56no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF110GN20-S7
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$1844 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed651 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66189.1
Floating-point performance1,331.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M2090 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3696 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.08.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−100%
42
+100%
1440p14−16
−107%
29
+107%
4K14−16
−114%
30
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 49
−93.9%
95−100
+93.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−86%
160−170
+86%
Hitman 3 44
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
−86.7%
140−150
+86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−86%
160−170
+86%
Hitman 3 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−80%
45−50
+80%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−86%
160−170
+86%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
−81.8%
100−105
+81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Far Cry 5 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Hitman 3 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%

This is how Tesla M2090 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 107% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 114% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.50 18.66
Recency 25 July 2011 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 29 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1603 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.