Radeon RX 5500M vs Tesla K80

Place in performance ranking	329	345
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.53	9.23
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GK210	Navi 14 / R19M-E85
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	17 November 2014 (9 years ago)	29 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$83	$998

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla K80 has 36% better value for money than RX 5500M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2496	1408
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1327 MHz
Boost clock speed	824 MHz	1645 MHz
Number of transistors	7,100 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.4	144.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla K80 and Radeon RX 5500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	240.6 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.7	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K80 15.15
+6.3%

RX 5500M 14.25

Tesla K80 outperforms Radeon RX 5500M by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla K80 5852
+6.4%

RX 5500M 5502

Tesla K80 outperforms Radeon RX 5500M by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 −1.8%	56 +1.8%
1440p	50−55 −2%	51 +2%
4K	30−35 +0%	30 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+0%

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +4.7%	43 −4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −1.8%	56 +1.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −2.2%	45−50 +2.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +4.7%	43 −4.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +6.1%	30−35 −6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +2.9%	65−70 −2.9%
Hitman 3	60−65 +3.4%	58 −3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +0.8%	119 −0.8%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −4.4%	45−50 +4.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +5.3%	57 −5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −1%	101 +1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +3.4%	58 −3.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +0%	40 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +3.8%	26 −3.8%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +2.9%	34 −2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +4.2%	48 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +6.1%	30−35 −6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +2.9%	65−70 −2.9%
Hitman 3	50−55 +0%	50 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +4.2%	144 −4.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +3.7%	82 −3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +4.2%	72 −4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +1.2%	168 −1.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −3.3%	31 +3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +3.8%	26 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +0%	30 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +6.1%	30−35 −6.1%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +2.9%	65−70 −2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +1.4%	69 −1.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +4.2%	72 −4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +0%	45 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −4.8%	22 +4.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+1.9%

−1.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +1.9%	54 −1.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +5.8%	52 −5.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +0%	30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +4.2%	48 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +0%	55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −4.4%	47 +4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +0%	16 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+0%

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +3.4%	29 −3.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Hitman 3	9−10 +0%	9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −7.1%	15 +7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −4.2%	25 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −4.2%	25 +4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+5%

−5%

This is how Tesla K80 and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

RX 5500M is 2% faster in 1080p
RX 5500M is 2% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.15	14.25
Recency	17 November 2014	29 September 2019
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	85 Watt