Quadro NVS 510M vs Tesla K20c

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K20c with Quadro NVS 510M, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K20c
2012
5 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
8.90
+1335%

Tesla K20c outperforms NVS 510M by a whopping 1335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4831191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Power efficiency2.741.23
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK110G71
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 November 2012 (11 years ago)21 August 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496no data
Core clock speed706 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate146.810.80
Floating-point processing power3.524 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4016
TMUs20824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount5 GB256 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/s19.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.90 0.62
Recency 12 November 2012 21 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla K20c has a 1335.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 510M, on the other hand, has 542.9% lower power consumption.

The Tesla K20c is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K20c is a workstation card while Quadro NVS 510M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Quadro NVS 510M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 12 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.