Quadro K2000D vs Tesla K20c

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Tesla K20c
8.90
+119%

Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K2000D by 119% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking453647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.410.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110GK107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (11 years old)1 March 2013 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 $599
Current price$591 (0.2x MSRP)$438 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla K20c has 281% better value for money than K2000D.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496384
Core clock speed706 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt51 Watt
Texture fill rate146.830.53
Floating-point performance3,524 gflops732.7 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm202 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5200 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.53.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K20c 8.90
+119%
K2000D 4.07

Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K2000D by 119% in our combined benchmark results.


Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Tesla K20c 60
+400%
K2000D 12

Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K2000D by 400% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.90 4.07
Recency 12 November 2012 1 March 2013
Cost $3199 $599
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 51 Watt

The Tesla K20c is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000D in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K2000D

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate NVIDIA Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2000D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.