NVIDIA Quadro K2000D: specs and benchmarks

NVIDIA started Quadro K2000D sales 1 March 2013 at a recommended price of $599. This is Kepler architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 4 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 64 GB / s.

Compatibility-wise, this is Single-slot card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 202 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 51 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 3.17 percent of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti.

Of Quadro K2000D's architecture, market type and release date.

Quadro K2000D's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K2000D's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Information on Quadro K2000D's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K2000D: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K2000D.

APIs supported by Quadro K2000D, sometimes including their particular versions.

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K2000D. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K2000D. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Let's see how good Quadro K2000D is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Comparisons with system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.