Quadro K2200 vs Tesla K20c
Aggregated performance score
Quadro K2200 outperforms Tesla K20c by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 454 | 441 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 1.43 | 2.88 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Maxwell (2014−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK110 | GM107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 (11 years ago) | 22 July 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | $395.75 |
| Current price | $591 (0.2x MSRP) | $313 (0.8x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro K2200 has 101% better value for money than Tesla K20c.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2496 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1124 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 146.8 | 44.96 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 202 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro K2200 outperforms Tesla K20c by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K2200 by 94% in Octane Render OctaneBench.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 8.90 | 9.17 |
| Recency | 12 November 2012 | 22 July 2014 |
| Cost | $3199 | $395.75 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 68 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla K20c and Quadro K2200.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
