Radeon HD 8240 vs TITAN Xp

Place in performance ranking	53	1152
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	53.57	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	GP102	Temash
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	6 April 2017 (7 years ago)	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$174 (0.1x MSRP)	$280

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN Xp and HD 8240 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	128
Core clock speed	1405 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	11,800 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	379.7	3.200
Floating-point performance	12,150 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on TITAN Xp and Radeon HD 8240 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	11408 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	547.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN Xp 50.30
+7759%

HD 8240 0.64

TITAN Xp outperforms Radeon HD 8240 by 7759% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN Xp 19424
+7796%

HD 8240 246

TITAN Xp outperforms Radeon HD 8240 by 7796% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

230−240

+7567%

3−4
−7567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Cyberpunk 2077	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +7400%	1−2 −7400%
Hitman 3	150−160 +7400%	2−3 −7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	900−950 +7400%	12−14 −7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	550−600 +7757%	7−8 −7757%
Watch Dogs: Legion	700−750 +7678%	9−10 −7678%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Cyberpunk 2077	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +7400%	1−2 −7400%
Hitman 3	150−160 +7400%	2−3 −7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	900−950 +7400%	12−14 −7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	550−600 +7757%	7−8 −7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	700−750 +7678%	9−10 −7678%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Cyberpunk 2077	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	900−950 +7400%	12−14 −7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	550−600 +7757%	7−8 −7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	700−750 +7678%	9−10 −7678%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +7400%	4−5 −7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +7400%	1−2 −7400%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +7400%	1−2 −7400%
Hitman 3	450−500 +7400%	6−7 −7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +7567%	3−4 −7567%