Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile Radeon Pro WX 7130 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.39
+609%

TITAN V outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.32
Power efficiency12.386.71
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and Pro WX 3200 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120640
Core clock speed1200 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate465.634.62
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs32032
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.39
+609%
Pro WX 3200 6.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+609%
Pro WX 3200 2414

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+567%
18
−567%
1440p152
+624%
21−24
−624%
4K82
+925%
8
−925%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.9911.06
1440p19.739.48
4K36.5724.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 24
+0%
24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how TITAN V and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 567% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 624% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 925% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 71 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.39 6.26
Recency 7 December 2017 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

TITAN V has a 609.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
K3100M Quadro K3100M
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
GT 130M GeForce GT 130M
vs
9650M GS GeForce 9650M GS
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R5 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Iris Pro Graphics 6200
vs
ATI Wii GPU Wii GPU
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
ATI X1650 PRO Radeon X1650 PRO
vs
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
HD Graphics P4000 HD Graphics P4000
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
HD 6970M Radeon HD 6970M
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
R5 240 OEM Radeon R5 240 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3284 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.