Quadro M4000 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	80	314
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.59
Power efficiency	12.38	10.05
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	GV100	GM204
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and Quadro M4000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	1664
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	773 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	21,100 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	80.39
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	2.573 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	320	104
Tensor Cores	640	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1 x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	Up to 192 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4
Multi-display synchronization	no data	Quadro Sync
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
High-Performance Video I/O6	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	7.0	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.39
+157%

Quadro M4000 17.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+157%

Quadro M4000 6672

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 156591
+730%

Quadro M4000 18862

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

TITAN V 150538
+670%

Quadro M4000 19551

GeekBench 5 CUDA

TITAN V 179522
+978%

Quadro M4000 16648

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p	152 +176%	55−60 −176%
4K	82 +173%	30−35 −173%

Cost per frame, $

1440p	19.73	14.38
4K	36.57	26.37

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.39	17.30
Recency	7 December 2017	29 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt

TITAN V has a 156.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M4000, on the other hand, has 108.3% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Quadro M4000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.