GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition Xavier
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
40.42
+194%

TITAN V outperforms 1050 Ti Mobile by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN V TITAN V
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110405
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.10no data
Power efficiency12.5814.25
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGV100GP107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (8 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120768
Core clock speed1200 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate465.677.76
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS2.488 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs32048
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache7.5 MB288 KB
L2 Cache4.5 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Anselno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.0+
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+186%
56
−186%
1440p152
+508%
25
−508%
4K82
+382%
17
−382%

Cost per frame, $

1080p18.74no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 57
+0%
57
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 76
+0%
76
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how TITAN V and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 186% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 508% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 382% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.42 13.74
Recency 7 December 2017 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

TITAN V has a 194.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 5050 GeForce RTX 5050
GRID M6-8Q NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
vs
8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
GRID M6-8Q NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
vs
A800 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
M4000M Quadro M4000M
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
R5 (Bristol Ridge) R5 (Bristol Ridge)
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
Tesla V100 SXM2 NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
Tesla V100 SXM2 NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Tesla V100 SXM2 NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Tesla V100 SXM2 NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3339 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1022 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.