Radeon RX 7600 XT vs TITAN RTX

Place in performance ranking	56	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.32	29.82
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	TU102	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$329
Current price	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)	$477 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 XT has 163% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	2048
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	352.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	204 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.83
+8.2%

RX 7600 XT 45.13

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX 7600 XT by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN RTX 18858
+8.2%

RX 7600 XT 17430

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX 7600 XT by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	158 +12.9%	140−150 −12.9%
1440p	104 +9.5%	95−100 −9.5%
4K	76 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

85−90
+7.6%

−7.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +5.8%	104 −5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +5.8%	104 −5.8%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +5.3%	209 −5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +4.9%	143 −4.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +7.6%	79 −7.6%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +2.4%	127 −2.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	210−220 +4.5%	201 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +7%	187 −7%
Hitman 3	120−130 +2.6%	117 −2.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +5.4%	332 −5.4%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +4.2%	144 −4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +2.4%	127 −2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 −0.3%	351 +0.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +7.1%	112 −7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +5.3%	95 −5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +8%	88 −8%
Battlefield 5	210−220 +3.4%	203 −3.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +6.9%	131 −6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +7.6%	79 −7.6%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −1%	101 +1%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +3.9%	154 −3.9%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +6.3%	254 −6.3%
Hitman 3	100−105 +6.4%	94 −6.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +4.2%	336 −4.2%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +2.2%	137 −2.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +3.2%	126 −3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +4.9%	286 −4.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	280−290 +4.9%	267 −4.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +7.8%	204 −7.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +7.6%	79 −7.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +6.3%	80 −6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +7.8%	102 −7.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +7.6%	79 −7.6%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +2.9%	175 −2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +5.5%	218 −5.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260−270 +7.4%	242 −7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +7.9%	139 −7.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +4.7%	86 −4.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

130−140
+5.7%

123

−5.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +2%	95−100 −2%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +4.2%	144 −4.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +6.1%	66 −6.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +6.6%	122 −6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +6.1%	66 −6.1%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +4.5%	134 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +1.9%	157 −1.9%
Hitman 3	100−105 +0%	100 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +7.1%	168 −7.1%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +5.3%	114 −5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 +3.8%	183 −3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +3.9%	75−80 −3.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +7.1%	70 −7.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130
+0.8%

119

−0.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +8%	88 −8%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +4.5%	67 −4.5%
Hitman 3	50−55 +4.2%	48 −4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +6.1%	65−70 −6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +6.1%	66 −6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +6.8%	103 −6.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +5.8%	52 −5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +4.7%	43 −4.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +2%	49 −2%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +5.3%	114 −5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +7.8%	102 −7.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +3.7%	82 −3.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +4.7%	43 −4.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+8.1%

−8.1%

This is how TITAN RTX and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 13% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 9% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 9% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	48.83	45.13
Recency	18 December 2018	8 January 2024
Cost	$2499	$329
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	190 Watt