Radeon RX 7600 XT vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Place in performance ranking	61	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	69
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.60	29.82
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Turing TU104	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$329
Current price	$261 (0.5x MSRP)	$477 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 56% better value for money than RX 7600 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2048
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	283.2	352.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	204 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.26
+4.8%

RX 7600 XT 45.10

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon RX 7600 XT by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 Super 18249
+4.8%

RX 7600 XT 17418

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon RX 7600 XT by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +10%	120−130 −10%
1440p	83 +10.7%	75−80 −10.7%
4K	54 +8%	50−55 −8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
+1.1%

−1.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 −4%	104 +4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +2.3%	88 −2.3%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +3.8%	183 −3.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +0.8%	119 −0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +1.2%	84 −1.2%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0.7%	149 −0.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +1.3%	158 −1.3%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +3.4%	174 −3.4%
Hitman 3	120−130 +3.4%	116 −3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	290−300 +3.9%	279 −3.9%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +4.2%	144 −4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −1.7%	122 +1.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260−270 +3.2%	252 −3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −0.9%	111 +0.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +0%	90 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +1.4%	74 −1.4%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +4.7%	172 −4.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +0%	120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +0%	120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +4.7%	258 −4.7%
Hitman 3	95−100 +3.3%	92 −3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +3.7%	270 −3.7%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +3.2%	126 −3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −0.8%	121 +0.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +1%	198 −1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 −0.6%	181 +0.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +2.3%	215 −2.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +0%	65 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −1.5%	66 +1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +4.4%	91 −4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +2.7%	73 −2.7%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +2.4%	83 −2.4%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +4.6%	153 −4.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +2.6%	156 −2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +1.8%	167 −1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +0%	100 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +2.9%	68 −2.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−3.6%

114
+3.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +1.7%	118 −1.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −1.5%	132 +1.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −3.6%	57 +3.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −1.3%	81 +1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −4.4%	47 +4.4%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +2%	98 −2%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +4%	125 −4%
Hitman 3	70−75 −1.4%	71 +1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +1.7%	118 −1.7%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +4.4%	91 −4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −2.5%	123 +2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −2%	51 +2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+0%

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +4.2%	48 −4.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 −5%	42 +5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +3.2%	60−65 −3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −2.2%	46 +2.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +2.9%	68 −2.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.6%	39 −2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −6.7%	32 +6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +2.3%	44 −2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +4.3%	23 −4.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +1.2%	84 −1.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +1.4%	69 −1.4%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −3.6%	57 +3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +3.4%	29 −3.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+1.7%

−1.7%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super is 10% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super is 11% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	47.26	45.10
Recency	2 July 2019	8 January 2024
Cost	$499	$329
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	190 Watt