Quadro T2000 Mobile vs TITAN RTX

Place in the ranking	63	261
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.51	no data
Power efficiency	12.81	25.32
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	TU102	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	1024
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	114.2
Floating-point processing power	16.31 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	32
TMUs	288	64
Tensor Cores	576	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.89
+136%

T2000 Mobile 20.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+136%

T2000 Mobile 7985

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

TITAN RTX 49596
+267%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	163 +151%	65−70 −151%
1440p	105 +163%	40−45 −163%
4K	74 +147%	30−35 −147%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

79
+139%

30−35

−139%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +126%	45−50 −126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	104 +197%	35−40 −197%
Battlefield 5	209 +207%	65−70 −207%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	143 +240%	40−45 −240%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +139%	30−35 −139%
Far Cry 5	127 +165%	45−50 −165%
Far Cry New Dawn	201 +265%	55−60 −265%
Forza Horizon 4	281 +121%	120−130 −121%
Hitman 3	117 +185%	40−45 −185%
Horizon Zero Dawn	348 +252%	95−100 −252%
Metro Exodus	144 +103%	70−75 −103%
Red Dead Redemption 2	127 +131%	55−60 −131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	206 +199%	65−70 −199%
Watch Dogs: Legion	215 +131%	90−95 −131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	186 +304%	45−50 −304%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +151%	35−40 −151%
Battlefield 5	203 +199%	65−70 −199%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	131 +212%	40−45 −212%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +139%	30−35 −139%
Far Cry 5	101 +110%	45−50 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	154 +180%	55−60 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	254 +100%	120−130 −100%
Hitman 3	116 +183%	40−45 −183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	336 +239%	95−100 −239%
Metro Exodus	144 +103%	70−75 −103%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110 +100%	55−60 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	286 +314%	65−70 −314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +120%	45−50 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	204 +119%	90−95 −119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	79 +71.7%	45−50 −71.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 +129%	35−40 −129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	102 +143%	40−45 −143%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +136%	30−35 −136%
Far Cry 5	79 +64.6%	45−50 −64.6%
Forza Horizon 4	175 +37.8%	120−130 −37.8%
Hitman 3	111 +171%	40−45 −171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	218 +120%	95−100 −120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	242 +251%	65−70 −251%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 +202%	45−50 −202%
Watch Dogs: Legion	86 −8.1%	90−95 +8.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

123
+124%

55−60

−124%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +145%	40−45 −145%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +134%	30−35 −134%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +157%	21−24 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +247%	18−20 −247%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +243%	21−24 −243%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +450%	12−14 −450%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +138%	24−27 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +120%	110−120 −120%
Hitman 3	100 +317%	24−27 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	168 +300%	40−45 −300%
Metro Exodus	114 +192%	35−40 −192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 +326%	40−45 −326%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Watch Dogs: Legion	205 +69.4%	120−130 −69.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

119
+250%

30−35

−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	88 +340%	20−22 −340%
Far Cry New Dawn	67 +319%	16−18 −319%
Hitman 3	48 +200%	16−18 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150 +40.2%	100−110 −40.2%
Metro Exodus	121 +450%	21−24 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +390%	21−24 −390%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 +333%	12−14 −333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +291%	10−12 −291%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50 +355%	10−12 −355%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +725%	4−5 −725%
Far Cry 5	49 +345%	10−12 −345%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +307%	27−30 −307%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	109 +354%	24−27 −354%
Watch Dogs: Legion	43 +378%	9−10 −378%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

74
+311%

18−20

−311%

This is how TITAN RTX and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 151% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 163% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 147% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the TITAN RTX is 725% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games: