Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060

Place in the ranking	131	269
Place by popularity	19	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	39.52	no data
Power efficiency	15.86	23.88
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	TU106	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 January 2019 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1024
Core clock speed	1365 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1680 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	201.6	114.2
Floating-point processing power	6.451 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	120	64
Tensor Cores	240	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.77
+77%

T2000 Mobile 20.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 14139
+77.1%

T2000 Mobile 7985

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 27163
+101%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 +86.2%	65−70 −86.2%
1440p	77 +92.5%	40−45 −92.5%
4K	50 +85.2%	27−30 −85.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.88	no data
1440p	4.53	no data
4K	6.98	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +103%	35−40 −103%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +90.2%	40−45 −90.2%
Elden Ring	120−130 +93.9%	65−70 −93.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90 +36.4%	65−70 −36.4%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +103%	35−40 −103%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +90.2%	40−45 −90.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +100%	85−90 −100%
Metro Exodus	101 +80.4%	55−60 −80.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 +132%	45−50 −132%
Valorant	185 +120%	80−85 −120%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	147 +123%	65−70 −123%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +103%	35−40 −103%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +90.2%	40−45 −90.2%
Dota 2	83 +13.7%	70−75 −13.7%
Elden Ring	120−130 +93.9%	65−70 −93.9%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +38.2%	65−70 −38.2%
Fortnite	155 +42.2%	100−110 −42.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +100%	85−90 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	124 +69.9%	70−75 −69.9%
Metro Exodus	75 +33.9%	55−60 −33.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	235 +70.3%	130−140 −70.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	56 +19.1%	45−50 −19.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +95.5%	65−70 −95.5%
Valorant	104 +23.8%	80−85 −23.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 +18.2%	230−240 −18.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +21.2%	65−70 −21.2%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +103%	35−40 −103%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +90.2%	40−45 −90.2%
Dota 2	110−120 +60.3%	70−75 −60.3%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +38.2%	65−70 −38.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +100%	85−90 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	117 −17.9%	130−140 +17.9%
Valorant	162 +92.9%	80−85 −92.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Elden Ring	70−75 +109%	35−40 −109%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +97.1%	30−35 −97.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +1.7%	170−180 −1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +84.2%	18−20 −84.2%
World of Tanks	230−240 +67.1%	140−150 −67.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +64.3%	40−45 −64.3%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +112%	16−18 −112%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +112%	16−18 −112%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +107%	55−60 −107%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +94.4%	50−55 −94.4%
Metro Exodus	76 +61.7%	45−50 −61.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +114%	27−30 −114%
Valorant	102 +88.9%	50−55 −88.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +118%	16−18 −118%
Dota 2	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%
Elden Ring	30−35 +127%	14−16 −127%
Grand Theft Auto V	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%
Metro Exodus	26 +73.3%	14−16 −73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	115 +85.5%	60−65 −85.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +84.6%	12−14 −84.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +118%	16−18 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Dota 2	70−75 +103%	35−40 −103%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +96.3%	27−30 −96.3%
Fortnite	50−55 +104%	24−27 −104%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +93.5%	30−35 −93.5%
Valorant	46 +84%	24−27 −84%

This is how RTX 2060 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 is 86% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 is 93% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 is 85% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 is 167% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 18% faster.

All in all, in popular games: