GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 2080 Super, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
17.87

RTX 2080 Super outperforms T2000 Mobile by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.11
Power efficiency23.6313.87
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)23 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243072
Core clock speed1575 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1815 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2348.5
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T2000 Mobile 17.87
RTX 2080 Super 43.71
+145%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985
RTX 2080 Super 19532
+145%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Mobile 13524
RTX 2080 Super 40963
+203%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−151%
138
+151%
1440p35−40
−163%
92
+163%
4K27−30
−159%
70
+159%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.07
1440pno data7.60
4Kno data9.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
−179%
140−150
+179%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−129%
250−260
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−176%
110−120
+176%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
−179%
140−150
+179%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−52.5%
122
+52.5%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−129%
250−260
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−176%
110−120
+176%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−65.2%
109
+65.2%
Fortnite 100−110
−148%
253
+148%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−81%
143
+81%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−131%
140−150
+131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−134%
173
+134%
Valorant 140−150
−108%
301
+108%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
−179%
140−150
+179%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−37.5%
110
+37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−129%
250−260
+129%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−19.8%
270−280
+19.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−176%
110−120
+176%
Dota 2 100−110
−26.6%
138
+26.6%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−59.1%
105
+59.1%
Fortnite 100−110
−81.4%
185
+81.4%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−79.7%
142
+79.7%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−131%
140−150
+131%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−54.8%
113
+54.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−121%
93
+121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−127%
168
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−248%
195
+248%
Valorant 140−150
−95.2%
283
+95.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−63.8%
131
+63.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−117%
89
+117%
Dota 2 100−110
−18.3%
129
+18.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−60.6%
106
+60.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−68.4%
133
+68.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−115%
159
+115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−94.6%
109
+94.6%
Valorant 140−150
−49.7%
217
+49.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−76.5%
180
+76.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−215%
120−130
+215%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−135%
300−350
+135%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−152%
63
+152%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.3%
170−180
+2.3%
Valorant 180−190
−50%
273
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−96.4%
108
+96.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−217%
57
+217%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−127%
100
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−139%
117
+139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−194%
90−95
+194%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−182%
127
+182%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−222%
55−60
+222%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−229%
115
+229%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−150%
40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−172%
79
+172%
Valorant 110−120
−136%
262
+136%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−134%
68
+134%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−222%
55−60
+222%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−288%
31
+288%
Dota 2 65−70
−73.1%
116
+73.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−190%
61
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−138%
81
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−258%
68
+258%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
−220%
64
+220%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 151% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 163% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 159% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 288% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 Super surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.87 43.71
Recency 27 May 2019 23 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 250 Watt

T2000 Mobile has 316.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 144.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 456 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2677 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T2000 Mobile or GeForce RTX 2080 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.