Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs TITAN RTX

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

TITAN RTX
48.66
+86.4%

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 86% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking57190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money11.316.16
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameTU102N19E-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 December 2018 (5 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data
Current price$1035 (0.4x MSRP)$2393
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN RTX has 84% better value for money than RTX 3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081920
Core clock speed1350 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8198.7

Size and compatibility

Information on TITAN RTX and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.66
+86.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 86% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN RTX 18858
+86.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 86% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

TITAN RTX 99561
+97.9%
RTX 3000 Mobile 50309

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 98% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

TITAN RTX 49596
+149%
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 149% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 35821
+141%
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 141% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 177477
+94.2%
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 94% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD162
+70.5%
95
−70.5%
1440p107
+94.5%
55−60
−94.5%
4K77
−14.3%
88
+14.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+83.7%
40−45
−83.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+35.1%
77
−35.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+126%
45−50
−126%
Battlefield 5 163
+94%
80−85
−94%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 213
+209%
65−70
−209%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+83.7%
40−45
−83.7%
Far Cry 5 165
+143%
65−70
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 135
+48.4%
91
−48.4%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+117%
85−90
−117%
Hitman 3 222
+181%
75−80
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
+154%
55−60
−154%
Red Dead Redemption 2 133
+217%
40−45
−217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
+74%
100
−74%
Watch Dogs: Legion 112
+124%
50−55
−124%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95
+53.2%
62
−53.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+91.3%
45−50
−91.3%
Battlefield 5 164
+95.2%
80−85
−95.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180
+161%
65−70
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+83.7%
40−45
−83.7%
Far Cry 5 156
+129%
65−70
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 129
+50%
86
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+116%
85−90
−116%
Hitman 3 206
+161%
75−80
−161%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+111%
55−60
−111%
Metro Exodus 134
+205%
40−45
−205%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+121%
40−45
−121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 165
+96.4%
84
−96.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+145%
109
−145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 97
+94%
50−55
−94%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+103%
39
−103%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+73.9%
45−50
−73.9%
Battlefield 5 160
+90.5%
80−85
−90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+81.4%
40−45
−81.4%
Far Cry 5 146
+115%
65−70
−115%
Far Cry New Dawn 117
+51.9%
77
−51.9%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+103%
85−90
−103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+148%
56
−148%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
+72%
50−55
−72%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
+228%
40−45
−228%
Hitman 3 145
+230%
40−45
−230%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
+157%
35−40
−157%
Metro Exodus 85
+227%
24−27
−227%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+215%
20−22
−215%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
+246%
35−40
−246%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+154%
24−27
−154%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+67.2%
55−60
−67.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+288%
16−18
−288%
Far Cry 5 134
+198%
45−50
−198%
Far Cry New Dawn 114
+128%
50−55
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+191%
50−55
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
+250%
20−22
−250%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+276%
21−24
−276%
Hitman 3 82
+228%
24−27
−228%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 55
+244%
16−18
−244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+193%
14−16
−193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
+267%
18−20
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+255%
27−30
−255%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+206%
16−18
−206%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+207%
14−16
−207%
Battlefield 5 97
+213%
30−35
−213%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 80
+264%
21−24
−264%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+215%
24−27
−215%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+208%
35−40
−208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+258%
12−14
−258%

This is how TITAN RTX and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • TITAN RTX is 70.5% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • TITAN RTX is 94.5% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 14.3% faster than TITAN RTX

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the TITAN RTX is 371% faster than the RTX 3000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, TITAN RTX surpassed RTX 3000 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 48.66 26.10
Recency 18 December 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 80 Watt

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 790 votes

Rate NVIDIA TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 219 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.