Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
19.97
+14.8%

T1200 Mobile outperforms T1000 Max-Q by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking260293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameno dataN19P-Q1
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed855 MHz795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on T1200 Mobile and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+18%
50−55
−18%
1440p34
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
4K109
+21.1%
90−95
−21.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 109 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 54 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 63 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 19 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 41 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

This is how T1200 Mobile and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 18% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 26% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.97 17.40
Recency 12 April 2021 27 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.