Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1000 and Radeon AI PRO R9700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T1000
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.22

AI PRO R9700 outperforms T1000 by a whopping 291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking32617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.7918.10
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 May 2021 (4 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8964096
Core clock speed1065 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate78.12747.5
Floating-point processing power2.5 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs56256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length156 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 18.22
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+291%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7633
AI PRO R9700 29830
+291%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−286%
220−230
+286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−285%
300−310
+285%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Far Cry 5 62
−287%
240−250
+287%
Fortnite 95−100
−254%
350−400
+254%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−287%
290−300
+287%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−286%
270−280
+286%
Valorant 140−150
−290%
550−600
+290%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−285%
300−310
+285%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−274%
850−900
+274%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Far Cry 5 57
−286%
220−230
+286%
Fortnite 95−100
−254%
350−400
+254%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−287%
290−300
+287%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
−290%
300−310
+290%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Metro Exodus 35
−271%
130−140
+271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−286%
270−280
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−291%
250−260
+291%
Valorant 140−150
−290%
550−600
+290%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−285%
300−310
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Far Cry 5 53
−277%
200−210
+277%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−287%
290−300
+287%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−286%
270−280
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−271%
130−140
+271%
Valorant 140−150
−290%
550−600
+290%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−254%
350−400
+254%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−270%
500−550
+270%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−285%
650−700
+285%
Valorant 170−180
−269%
650−700
+269%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−277%
200−210
+277%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−272%
160−170
+272%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Valorant 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%

This is how T1000 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 286% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.22 71.19
Recency 6 May 2021 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

T1000 has 500% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 290.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the T1000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1000
T1000
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 72 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T1000 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.