RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1100

Place in the ranking	1460	109
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	23.92
Architecture	Rage 8 (2002−2007)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	RC410	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	17 October 2007 (17 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	3072
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	130 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	0.6	no data
ROPs	2	no data
TMUs	2	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	16000 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0 (9_0)	12 Ultimate
OpenGL	2.0	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Xpress 1100 0.09

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.46
+43744%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 1100 34

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15222
+44671%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−42400%

850−900
+42400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −43233%	1300−1350 +43233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −43650%	1750−1800 +43650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −43650%	3500−3550 +43650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −43650%	1750−1800 +43650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −43650%	12250−12300 +43650%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −43233%	1300−1350 +43233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −43650%	1750−1800 +43650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −43650%	3500−3550 +43650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −43650%	1750−1800 +43650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −43233%	3900−3950 +43233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −43650%	12250−12300 +43650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −43233%	1300−1350 +43233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −43650%	1750−1800 +43650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −43650%	3500−3550 +43650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −43650%	1750−1800 +43650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −43233%	3900−3950 +43233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −43650%	12250−12300 +43650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −43233%	2600−2650 +43233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −42400%	850−900 +42400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−42400%

850−900
+42400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −39900%	400−450 +39900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−42400%

850−900
+42400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.09	39.46
Recency	17 October 2007	21 March 2023
Chip lithography	130 nm	5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 43744.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1100 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.