Radeon RX 6800M vs ATI X300 SE HyperMemory

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.40
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV370Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2006 (18 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed325 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2390 MHz
Number of transistors107 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate1.300382.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2006 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 145 Watt

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory has 383.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory and Radeon RX 6800M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 308 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.