Radeon R7 265 vs Pro WX 4100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Radeon R7 265, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
9.46

R7 265 outperforms Pro WX 4100 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking466437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.305.25
Power efficiency13.164.82
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameBaffinPitcairn
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 265 has 59% better value for money than Pro WX 4100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1125 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1201 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8659.20
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.46 10.39
Recency 10 November 2016 13 February 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

R7 265, on the other hand, has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Radeon R7 265.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 373 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.