GeForce RTX 3070 vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	576	42
Place by popularity	not in top-100	37
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	58.15
Power efficiency	29.48	18.21
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	5888
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	317.4
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	96
TMUs	24	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	-	8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.41

RTX 3070 58.05
+806%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465

RTX 3070 22322
+806%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −838%	150 +838%
1440p	10−12 −880%	98 +880%
4K	7−8 −814%	64 +814%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.33
1440p	no data	5.09
4K	no data	7.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −964%	149 +964%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −1031%	147 +1031%
Elden Ring	16−18 −735%	142 +735%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −485%	110−120 +485%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −864%	135 +864%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −854%	124 +854%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1096%	311 +1096%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −675%	124 +675%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −521%	118 +521%
Valorant	18−20 −1195%	246 +1195%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −485%	110−120 +485%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −736%	117 +736%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −738%	109 +738%
Dota 2	21−24 −523%	137 +523%
Elden Ring	16−18 −1318%	241 +1318%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −214%	91 +214%
Fortnite	35−40 −503%	220−230 +503%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −885%	256 +885%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −509%	134 +509%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −569%	107 +569%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −306%	210−220 +306%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −416%	98 +416%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −770%	170−180 +770%
Valorant	18−20 −737%	159 +737%
World of Tanks	100−110 −176%	270−280 +176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −485%	110−120 +485%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −650%	105 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −600%	91 +600%
Dota 2	21−24 −468%	125 +468%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −303%	110−120 +303%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −758%	223 +758%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −306%	210−220 +306%
Valorant	18−20 −1147%	237 +1147%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −1533%	98 +1533%
Elden Ring	8−9 −1550%	132 +1550%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −1257%	95 +1257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −373%	170−180 +373%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1160%	63 +1160%
World of Tanks	45−50 −726%	350−400 +726%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −691%	85−90 +691%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −656%	68 +656%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1060%	58 +1060%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −1131%	160−170 +1131%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1409%	166 +1409%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1163%	101 +1163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −1388%	110−120 +1388%
Valorant	16−18 −1124%	208 +1124%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	43
Dota 2	16−18 −588%	117 +588%
Elden Ring	3−4 −2167%	68 +2167%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −576%	115 +576%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −2350%	49 +2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −1044%	200−210 +1044%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −975%	43 +975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −588%	117 +588%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1380%	70−75 +1380%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	65−70
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Dota 2	16−18 −635%	125 +635%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1400%	100−110 +1400%
Fortnite	6−7 −1500%	95−100 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1533%	98 +1533%
Valorant	6−7 −1833%	116 +1833%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 is 838% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 is 880% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 is 814% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 is 2350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3070 surpassed UHD Graphics P630 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.41	58.05
Recency	24 May 2018	1 September 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	220 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 1366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 805.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.