Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 vs ATI X1600 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV530Weston
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed500 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1021 MHz
Number of transistors157 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00024.50
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7841 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed390 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.48 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.5 (6.0)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 50 Watt

ATI X1600 PRO has 22% lower power consumption.

530 Mobile DDR3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 PRO and Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 PRO is a desktop card while Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
Radeon X1600 PRO
AMD Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3
Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 121 vote

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.