AMD R5 310 OEM vs ATI X1600 PRO

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
TeraScale 2
GPU code name
Market segment
Launch date
5 May 2015 (6 years ago)
1 October 2007 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
Price now
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
Core clock speed
775 MHz
500 MHz
Number of transistors
370 million
157 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
90 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt
41 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
248.0 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 MB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
780 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
12.48 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

11.2 (11_0)
9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model

Competitors of Radeon R5 310 OEM from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R5 310 OEM from NVIDIA is GeForce GT 240.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R5 310 OEM:

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Much newer (5 May 2015 vs 1 October 2007)

Higher memory bandwidth (14.4 vs 12.48 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 vs 90 nm)

Lower power consumption (35W vs 41W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of ATI Radeon X1600 PRO

Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM and ATI Radeon X1600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.