Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 5300M vs Vega Frontier Edition
Combined performance score
Vega Frontier Edition outperforms RX 5300M by 210% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 141 | 385 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 6.17 | 12.61 |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | Vega 10 | Navi 14 / E19M-E65 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 27 June 2017 (6 years old) | 13 November 2019 (4 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Current price | $961 (1x MSRP) | $525 |
RX 5300M has 104% better value for money than Vega Frontier Edition.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 1382 MHz | 1036 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1445 MHz |
Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 409.6 | 127.2 |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and Radeon RX 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 168.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Vega Frontier Edition outperforms RX 5300M by 210% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Vega Frontier Edition outperforms RX 5300M by 209% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Vega Frontier Edition outperforms RX 5300M by 117% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Vega Frontier Edition outperforms RX 5300M by 209% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 190−200
+206%
| 62
−206%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 34.39 | 11.11 |
Recency | 27 June 2017 | 13 November 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.