Quadro T1000 vs Radeon VII

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
41.08
+156%

VII outperforms T1000 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.07no data
Power efficiency10.0423.16
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 February 2019 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1400 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate420.0no data
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 41.08
+156%
Quadro T1000 16.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16546
+156%
Quadro T1000 6469

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD123
+173%
45−50
−173%
1440p79
+163%
30−35
−163%
4K58
+176%
21−24
−176%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.68no data
1440p8.85no data
4K12.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+163%
35−40
−163%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+186%
14−16
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+162%
45−50
−162%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Metro Exodus 95
+171%
35−40
−171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 126
+180%
45−50
−180%
Valorant 238
+164%
90−95
−164%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 153
+178%
55−60
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+175%
12−14
−175%
Dota 2 128
+156%
50−55
−156%
Far Cry 5 103
+158%
40−45
−158%
Fortnite 180−190
+161%
70−75
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+177%
35−40
−177%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+178%
40−45
−178%
Metro Exodus 80
+167%
30−33
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+159%
80−85
−159%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70
+159%
27−30
−159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+160%
60−65
−160%
Valorant 143
+160%
55−60
−160%
World of Tanks 270−280
+179%
100−105
−179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+173%
30−33
−173%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Dota 2 147
+167%
55−60
−167%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+191%
35−40
−191%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+180%
30−33
−180%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
+173%
55−60
−173%
Valorant 197
+163%
75−80
−163%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 43
+169%
16−18
−169%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+169%
16−18
−169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+170%
60−65
−170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 46
+188%
16−18
−188%
World of Tanks 270−280
+173%
100−105
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+171%
7−8
−171%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+178%
50−55
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+190%
21−24
−190%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%
Metro Exodus 83
+177%
30−33
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%
Valorant 156
+160%
60−65
−160%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Dota 2 62
+158%
24−27
−158%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+158%
24−27
−158%
Metro Exodus 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+158%
55−60
−158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+158%
24−27
−158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+194%
18−20
−194%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 78
+160%
30−33
−160%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+175%
24−27
−175%
Fortnite 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+175%
12−14
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Valorant 89
+197%
30−33
−197%

This is how Radeon VII and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 173% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 163% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 176% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.08 16.06
Recency 7 February 2019 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon VII has a 155.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 490% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2870 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 427 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.