Quadro M5000 vs Radeon VII

Place in the ranking	88	236
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.05	3.26
Power efficiency	10.07	11.24
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Vega 20	GM204
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 February 2019 (6 years ago)	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$2,856.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Radeon VII has 668% better value for money than Quadro M5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2048
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	861 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	1038 MHz
Number of transistors	13,230 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.0	132.9
Floating-point processing power	13.44 TFLOPS	4.252 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	240	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	280 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2" (5.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1 x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	256 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1024 GB/s	Up to 211 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4
Multi-display synchronization	no data	Quadro Sync
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
High-Performance Video I/O6	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	no data	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	-	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 41.56
+76.1%

Quadro M5000 23.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16546
+76.1%

Quadro M5000 9394

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	123 +89.2%	65−70 −89.2%
1440p	79 +97.5%	40−45 −97.5%
4K	58 +93.3%	30−35 −93.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.68 +673%	43.95 −673%
1440p	8.85 +707%	71.42 −707%
4K	12.05 +690%	95.23 −690%

Radeon VII has 673% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Radeon VII has 707% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Radeon VII has 690% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +86%	50−55 −86%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	92 +84%	50−55 −84%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Forza Horizon 4	118 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +81.7%	60−65 −81.7%
Metro Exodus	95 +90%	50−55 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 +80%	70−75 −80%
Valorant	238 +83.1%	130−140 −83.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	153 +80%	85−90 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Dota 2	128 +82.9%	70−75 −82.9%
Far Cry 5	103 +87.3%	55−60 −87.3%
Fortnite	180−190 +83%	100−105 −83%
Forza Horizon 4	97 +76.4%	55−60 −76.4%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +81.7%	60−65 −81.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	111 +85%	60−65 −85%
Metro Exodus	80 +77.8%	45−50 −77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +88.2%	110−120 −88.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70 +100%	35−40 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +83.5%	85−90 −83.5%
Valorant	143 +78.8%	80−85 −78.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 +86%	150−160 −86%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	82 +82.2%	45−50 −82.2%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +100%	14−16 −100%
Dota 2	147 +83.8%	80−85 −83.8%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +85.5%	55−60 −85.5%
Forza Horizon 4	84 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +81.7%	60−65 −81.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150 +76.5%	85−90 −76.5%
Valorant	197 +79.1%	110−120 −79.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Dota 2	43 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	43 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +84.2%	95−100 −84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	46 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
World of Tanks	270−280 +82%	150−160 −82%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +92.5%	40−45 −92.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +90%	10−11 −90%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +85.3%	75−80 −85.3%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +103%	30−33 −103%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +82.5%	40−45 −82.5%
Metro Exodus	83 +84.4%	45−50 −84.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +95%	40−45 −95%
Valorant	156 +83.5%	85−90 −83.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Dota 2	62 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Metro Exodus	37 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +77.5%	80−85 −77.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +76.7%	30−33 −76.7%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +80%	5−6 −80%
Dota 2	78 +95%	40−45 −95%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +88.6%	35−40 −88.6%
Fortnite	60−65 +80%	35−40 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	33 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Valorant	89 +78%	50−55 −78%

This is how Radeon VII and Quadro M5000 compete in popular games:

Radeon VII is 89% faster in 1080p
Radeon VII is 98% faster in 1440p
Radeon VII is 93% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.56	23.60
Recency	7 February 2019	29 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	150 Watt

Radeon VII has a 76.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M5000, on the other hand, has 96.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while Quadro M5000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.