GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Radeon VII

Place in the ranking	86	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.76	100.00
Power efficiency	10.20	25.27
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Vega 20	TU116
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 February 2019 (5 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 288% better value for money than Radeon VII.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	1536
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	13,230 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.0	152.6
Floating-point processing power	13.44 TFLOPS	4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	240	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	280 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1024 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 43.17
+48.9%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 29.00

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon VII 37881
+88.3%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 20119

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+26%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 49309

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon VII 27449
+85.2%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 146094
+49.8%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 97517

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 430170
+2.5%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 419800

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Radeon VII 167
+13.9%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 147

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 +38.6%	88 −38.6%
1440p	78 +34.5%	58 −34.5%
4K	54 +68.8%	32 −68.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.73	2.60
1440p	8.96	3.95
4K	12.94	7.16

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

75−80

−11.7%

86
+11.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	76 −5.3%	80 +5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	99 +50%	66 −50%
Battlefield 5	160 +24%	129 −24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +6.1%	82 −6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +13.2%	68 −13.2%
Far Cry 5	116 +18.4%	98 −18.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	113 +10.8%	102 −10.8%
Forza Horizon 4	227 −33.9%	304 +33.9%
Hitman 3	81 +5.2%	77 −5.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −18.8%	209 +18.8%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +6.3%	126 −6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 +27.3%	99 −27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	196 +26.5%	155 −26.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	214 −5.1%	225 +5.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	157 +25.6%	125 −25.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	82 +67.3%	49 −67.3%
Battlefield 5	150 +37.6%	109 −37.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +19.2%	73 −19.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +42.6%	54 −42.6%
Far Cry 5	90 +16.9%	77 −16.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	102 +45.7%	70 −45.7%
Forza Horizon 4	227 −12.8%	256 +12.8%
Hitman 3	79 +6.8%	74 −6.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −17.6%	207 +17.6%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +28.8%	104 −28.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +18.1%	83 −18.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	97 −21.6%	118 +21.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +58.9%	55−60 −58.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 −1.4%	214 +1.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +18.9%	53 −18.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +71.4%	42 −71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +64.2%	53 −64.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +48.1%	52 −48.1%
Far Cry 5	71 +24.6%	57 −24.6%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +31.3%	99 −31.3%
Hitman 3	75 +19%	63 −19%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95 +5.6%	90 −5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	84 −20.2%	101 +20.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +36.4%	55 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	63 +90.9%	33 −90.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

119
+48.8%

−48.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +28.8%	66 −28.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +43.5%	46 −43.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +30.6%	36 −30.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	57 +78.1%	32 −78.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +34.2%	38 −34.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +44%	25 −44%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +38.9%	36 −38.9%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +30.2%	182 −30.2%
Hitman 3	66 +61%	41 −61%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80 +23.1%	65 −23.1%
Metro Exodus	83 +38.3%	60 −38.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 +5.2%	55−60 −5.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +97%	30−35 −97%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200 −1.5%	203 +1.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

86
+53.6%

−53.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	58 +87.1%	31 −87.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +84%	25 −84%
Hitman 3	46 +84%	25 −84%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +154%	76 −154%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +39%	41 −39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +54.3%	35 −54.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	44 +100%	22 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 +169%	13 −169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +47.4%	19 −47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +60%	10 −60%
Far Cry 5	31 +72.2%	18 −72.2%
Forza Horizon 4	77 +114%	35−40 −114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	29 +123%	13 −123%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

43
+59.3%

−59.3%

This is how Radeon VII and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

Radeon VII is 39% faster in 1080p
Radeon VII is 34% faster in 1440p
Radeon VII is 69% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon VII is 169% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 34% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon VII is ahead in 60 tests (83%)
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ahead in 11 tests (15%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	43.17	29.00
Recency	7 February 2019	23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	80 Watt