Quadro FX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with Quadro FX 580, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.36
+6490%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms FX 580 by a whopping 6490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2111271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.000.01
Power efficiency24.460.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU116G96C
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)9 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 999900% better value for money than FX 580.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153632
Core clock speed1455 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate152.67.200
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS0.072 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.51.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
1440p580−1
4K350−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+7547%
199.00
−7547%
1440p3.95no data
4K6.54no data
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 7547% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 147
+7250%
2−3
−7250%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+7300%
1−2
−7300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 111
+11000%
1−2
−11000%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+6550%
2−3
−6550%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Far Cry 5 93
+9200%
1−2
−9200%
Fortnite 120−130
+12800%
1−2
−12800%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+9900%
1−2
−9900%
Hogwarts Legacy 62 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Valorant 209
+6867%
3−4
−6867%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+10200%
1−2
−10200%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+10000%
1−2
−10000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+6575%
4−5
−6575%
Cyberpunk 2077 54 0−1
Dota 2 121
+12000%
1−2
−12000%
Far Cry 5 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Fortnite 120−130
+12800%
1−2
−12800%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+12400%
1−2
−12400%
Forza Horizon 5 90
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+10400%
1−2
−10400%
Hogwarts Legacy 48 0−1
Metro Exodus 54 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+10200%
1−2
−10200%
Valorant 207
+6800%
3−4
−6800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+9300%
1−2
−9300%
Cyberpunk 2077 52 0−1
Dota 2 116
+11500%
1−2
−11500%
Far Cry 5 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+9800%
1−2
−9800%
Hogwarts Legacy 35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+10800%
1−2
−10800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55 0−1
Valorant 125
+12400%
1−2
−12400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+10600%
1−2
−10600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+9350%
2−3
−9350%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+8650%
2−3
−8650%
Valorant 197
+9750%
2−3
−9750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 19 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 0−1
Valorant 152
+7500%
2−3
−7500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1
Dota 2 85
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
Far Cry 5 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35 0−1

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and FX 580 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 8700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.36 0.40
Recency 23 April 2019 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 6490% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 580, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 580 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro FX 580 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Quadro FX 580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1641 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 95 votes

Rate Quadro FX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or Quadro FX 580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.