Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

Place in performance ranking	436	451
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	2.59	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years old)	27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price	$1307	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	896
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	94.92
Floating-point performance	2,588 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Quadro T500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
1440p	14−16 −7.1%	15 +7.1%
4K	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

18−20

−47.4%

28
+47.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

18−20

+0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

7−8
+16.7%

6−7

−16.7%

This is how RX Vega M GL and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

T500 Mobile is 2.9% faster than RX Vega M GL

1440p resolution:

T500 Mobile is 7.1% faster than RX Vega M GL

4K resolution:

T500 Mobile is 6.3% faster than RX Vega M GL

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 16.7% faster than the T500 Mobile.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 47.4% faster than the RX Vega M GL.

All in all, in popular games: