Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39

T1200 Mobile outperforms M GL by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1274.22
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed931 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8891.20
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064
L1 Cache320 KB1 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−93.3%
58
+93.3%
1440p16−18
−106%
33
+106%
4K40−45
−103%
81
+103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−53.5%
220−230
+53.5%
Dota 2 65−70
−65.2%
114
+65.2%
Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−103%
71
+103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−184%
71
+184%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−55.1%
107
+55.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−48%
37
+48%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−60%
30−35
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−211%
109
+211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 93% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 106% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 103% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 211% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile performs better in 17 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.39 17.35
Recency 1 February 2018 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 85% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 17% more advanced lithography process, and 261% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
E9171 MCM Radeon E9171 MCM
vs
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 85
E9173 PCIe Radeon E9173 PCIe
vs
8200M G mGPU 8200M G mGPU AMD
UHD Graphics 605 Intel Graphics 605
vs
RTX 5080 5080
UHD Graphics 600 Intel Graphics 600
vs
Vega 6 Mobile 6 Mobile
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
FirePro W2100 W2100
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 AMD HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
vs
Pro W6800 W6800
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 NVIDIA 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3090 3090
RX Vega Mobile AMD RX Vega Mobile
vs
Vega 6 Mobile 6 Mobile
RX 560 896SP 560 896SP
vs
RX 570G 570G
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
vs
Apple M1 GPU GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 165 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.