Radeon Pro 5600M vs RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
17.04

Pro 5600M outperforms RX Vega M GH by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking318230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362560
Core clock speed1063 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1265 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2164.8
Floating-point performance3.656 gflops5.274 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.04
Pro 5600M 23.93
+40.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6573
Pro 5600M 9232
+40.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−35.6%
80−85
+35.6%
1440p36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
4K28
−25%
35−40
+25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
−18.2%
50−55
+18.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−39.3%
75−80
+39.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−36.1%
45−50
+36.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−30%
35−40
+30%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 52
−21.2%
60−65
+21.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−30.6%
140−150
+30.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−30.6%
110−120
+30.6%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−41.4%
80−85
+41.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−61.5%
60−65
+61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−20.2%
100−110
+20.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−36.8%
50−55
+36.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Battlefield 5 33
−136%
75−80
+136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−53.7%
60−65
+53.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−30.6%
140−150
+30.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−30.6%
110−120
+30.6%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−41.4%
80−85
+41.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
−31.3%
60−65
+31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
−19.1%
80−85
+19.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−33.3%
50−55
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−20.2%
100−110
+20.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−148%
50−55
+148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−133%
45−50
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−30.6%
140−150
+30.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
−98.2%
110−120
+98.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
−42.1%
80−85
+42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−52.9%
50−55
+52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−20.2%
100−110
+20.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−125%
60−65
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
−108%
27−30
+108%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−275%
14−16
+275%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−40%
27−30
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−47.8%
130−140
+47.8%
Hitman 3 20−22
−40%
27−30
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−57.6%
50−55
+57.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−32%
130−140
+32%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−41.4%
120−130
+41.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

This is how RX Vega M GH and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 36% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 39% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5600M is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GH is 2% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.04 23.93
Recency 7 January 2018 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 40.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GH in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 43 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 74 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.