Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Place in performance ranking	141	249
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	26.66	4.85
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vega	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 August 2017 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$224 (0.6x MSRP)	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 450% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	1024
Core clock speed	1138 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1474 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	329.5	114.2
Floating-point performance	10,566 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 56 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	409.6 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	409.6 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.34
+66.1%

T2000 Mobile 20.67

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13261
+66.1%

T2000 Mobile 7985

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 66% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 29086
+115%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 115% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115 +76.9%	65−70 −76.9%
1440p	70 +75%	40−45 −75%
4K	51 +70%	30−35 −70%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+78.8%

30−35

−78.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	77 +92.5%	40−45 −92.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +71.4%	35−40 −71.4%
Battlefield 5	164 +141%	65−70 −141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +66.7%	40−45 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +78.8%	30−35 −78.8%
Far Cry 5	115 +140%	45−50 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	114 +107%	55−60 −107%
Forza Horizon 4	141 +51.6%	90−95 −51.6%
Hitman 3	70−75 +73.2%	40−45 −73.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +68.3%	80−85 −68.3%
Metro Exodus	144 +109%	65−70 −109%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +53.6%	55−60 −53.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +89.7%	65−70 −89.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +41.9%	60−65 −41.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70 +75%	40−45 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +71.4%	35−40 −71.4%
Battlefield 5	153 +125%	65−70 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +66.7%	40−45 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +78.8%	30−35 −78.8%
Far Cry 5	92 +91.7%	45−50 −91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	88 +60%	55−60 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	272 +192%	90−95 −192%
Hitman 3	70−75 +73.2%	40−45 −73.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +68.3%	80−85 −68.3%
Metro Exodus	106 +53.6%	65−70 −53.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +53.6%	55−60 −53.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +89.7%	65−70 −89.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	124 +176%	45−50 −176%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +41.9%	60−65 −41.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 +30%	40−45 −30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +71.4%	35−40 −71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +66.7%	40−45 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +78.8%	30−35 −78.8%
Far Cry 5	69 +43.8%	45−50 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +17.2%	90−95 −17.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +68.3%	80−85 −68.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +89.7%	65−70 −89.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +64.4%	45−50 −64.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +41.9%	60−65 −41.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+53.6%

55−60

−53.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	98 +145%	40−45 −145%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +100%	40−45 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	44 +110%	21−24 −110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.7%	18−20 −94.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Far Cry 5	74 +111%	35−40 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	88 +120%	40−45 −120%
Hitman 3	40−45 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +73.8%	40−45 −73.8%
Metro Exodus	74 +89.7%	35−40 −89.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +88.4%	40−45 −88.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+73.5%

30−35

−73.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	46 +130%	20−22 −130%
Far Cry New Dawn	32 +100%	16−18 −100%
Hitman 3	27−30 +75%	16−18 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +82.6%	21−24 −82.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +121%	14−16 −121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +110%	21−24 −110%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +125%	12−14 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	23 +109%	10−12 −109%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +111%	27−30 −111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +82.6%	21−24 −82.6%
Metro Exodus	42 +110%	20−22 −110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+66.7%

18−20

−66.7%

This is how RX Vega 56 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RX Vega 56 is 77% faster in 1080p
RX Vega 56 is 75% faster in 1440p
RX Vega 56 is 70% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 192% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX Vega 56 surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.34	20.67
Recency	14 August 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	60 Watt