GRID K340 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with GRID K340, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.48
+76.8%

RX Vega 11 outperforms GRID K340 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking605759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency10.910.96
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRavenGK107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704384
Core clock speed300 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0430.40
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
1440p6
+100%
3−4
−100%
4K11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data235.64
1440pno data1099.67
4Kno data549.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+100%
10−11
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+78%
50−55
−78%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+81%
21−24
−81%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+95%
40−45
−95%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how RX Vega 11 and GRID K340 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 79% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 100% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 83% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.48 3.10
Recency 10 May 2018 23 July 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GRID K340 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1760 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.