Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060 XT 16GB
2025
16 GB GDDR6
55.20
+85.1%

9060 XT 16GB outperforms Pro B50 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiencyno data34.32
ArchitectureRDNA 4 (2025)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameno dataBMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 January 2025 (less than a year ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2530 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data332.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD171
+90%
90−95
−90%
1440p78
+95%
40−45
−95%
4K48
+100%
24−27
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.88
1440pno data8.73
4Kno data14.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+94.7%
150−160
−94.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+94.7%
75−80
−94.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 203
+103%
100−105
−103%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+95.3%
85−90
−95.3%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+94.7%
150−160
−94.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+94.7%
75−80
−94.7%
Far Cry 5 270
+92.9%
140−150
−92.9%
Fortnite 270−280
+96.4%
140−150
−96.4%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+90.8%
120−130
−90.8%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+88.4%
95−100
−88.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 157
+96.3%
80−85
−96.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+94.4%
90−95
−94.4%
Valorant 300−350
+90.6%
170−180
−90.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+95.3%
85−90
−95.3%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+94.7%
150−160
−94.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+85.3%
150−160
−85.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+94.7%
75−80
−94.7%
Far Cry 5 248
+90.8%
130−140
−90.8%
Fortnite 270−280
+96.4%
140−150
−96.4%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+90.8%
120−130
−90.8%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+88.4%
95−100
−88.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+92.5%
80−85
−92.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+98.3%
60−65
−98.3%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+86.3%
80−85
−86.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+94.4%
90−95
−94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+95%
140−150
−95%
Valorant 300−350
+90.6%
170−180
−90.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+95.3%
85−90
−95.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+94.7%
75−80
−94.7%
Far Cry 5 233
+94.2%
120−130
−94.2%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+90.8%
120−130
−90.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 91
+102%
45−50
−102%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+94.4%
90−95
−94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+94.7%
75−80
−94.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280
+96.4%
140−150
−96.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+92.2%
90−95
−92.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+92.6%
230−240
−92.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+108%
40−45
−108%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+92%
50−55
−92%
Valorant 350−400
+91%
200−210
−91%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+93.3%
75−80
−93.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+103%
40−45
−103%
Far Cry 5 160
+88.2%
85−90
−88.2%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+92%
100−105
−92%
Hogwarts Legacy 68
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+88.8%
80−85
−88.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+102%
45−50
−102%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Valorant 300−350
+89.4%
170−180
−89.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+87.3%
55−60
−87.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Far Cry 5 80
+100%
40−45
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+89.3%
75−80
−89.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 36
+100%
18−20
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+92%
50−55
−92%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%

This is how RX 9060 XT 16GB and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 95% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.20 29.82
Recency 2 January 2025 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 85.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B50 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 152 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.