RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon RX 8060S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RX 8060S
2025
41.81

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms RX 8060S by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.87
Power efficiencyno data10.13
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4024064
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,968
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
−98.1%
210−220
+98.1%
1440p50
−100%
100−110
+100%
4K36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data40.79
1440pno data85.65
4Kno data122.36

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 134
−101%
270−280
+101%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
−100%
450−500
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−102%
190−200
+102%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 110
−100%
220−230
+100%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−100%
270−280
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 215
−86%
400−450
+86%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−102%
190−200
+102%
Far Cry 5 96
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
Fortnite 170−180
−102%
350−400
+102%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−93.5%
300−310
+93.5%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−100%
250−260
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
Valorant 230−240
−94%
450−500
+94%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 95
−100%
190−200
+100%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−100%
270−280
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 109
−102%
220−230
+102%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−97.8%
550−600
+97.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−102%
190−200
+102%
Far Cry 5 95
−100%
190−200
+100%
Fortnite 170−180
−102%
350−400
+102%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−93.5%
300−310
+93.5%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−100%
250−260
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
−100%
250−260
+100%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−95.9%
190−200
+95.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−100%
290−300
+100%
Valorant 230−240
−94%
450−500
+94%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 92
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−100%
270−280
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−102%
190−200
+102%
Far Cry 5 92
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−93.5%
300−310
+93.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
−98%
200−210
+98%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
−102%
350−400
+102%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
−97.2%
140−150
+97.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−97.1%
550−600
+97.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
−103%
130−140
+103%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−103%
120−130
+103%
Valorant 260−270
−90.8%
500−550
+90.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 55
−100%
110−120
+100%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−96.1%
200−210
+96.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−104%
200−210
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−98.3%
230−240
+98.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−103%
160−170
+103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−96.3%
210−220
+96.3%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 35−40
−100%
70−75
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
−105%
150−160
+105%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−103%
75−80
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−100%
130−140
+100%
Valorant 240−250
−105%
500−550
+105%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 29
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−103%
130−140
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−105%
45−50
+105%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−104%
110−120
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−94.8%
150−160
+94.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−96.4%
110−120
+96.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%

This is how RX 8060S and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 98% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 100% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 94% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.81 85.96
Recency 6 January 2025 18 March 2025

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a 105.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 8060S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.