RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon RX 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

RX 8060S
2025
37.97

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 8060S by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data78.13
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores408960
Core clock speedno data790 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data374.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.96 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
−74.8%
180−190
+74.8%
1440p51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
4K35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
−57.7%
350−400
+57.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 215
−62.8%
350−400
+62.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Far Cry 5 96
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
Fortnite 170−180
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−73.1%
270−280
+73.1%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−71.9%
220−230
+71.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−77.2%
280−290
+77.2%
Valorant 230−240
−71.7%
400−450
+71.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 109
−74.3%
190−200
+74.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−61.9%
450−500
+61.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Far Cry 5 95
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Fortnite 170−180
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−73.1%
270−280
+73.1%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−71.9%
220−230
+71.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
−73.2%
220−230
+73.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−75.3%
170−180
+75.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−77.2%
280−290
+77.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−78.1%
260−270
+78.1%
Valorant 230−240
−71.7%
400−450
+71.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Far Cry 5 92
−73.9%
160−170
+73.9%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−73.1%
270−280
+73.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−77.2%
280−290
+77.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
−78.2%
180−190
+78.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 71
−69%
120−130
+69%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
−76.7%
500−550
+76.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
−71.4%
120−130
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Valorant 260−270
−70.5%
450−500
+70.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
−74.8%
180−190
+74.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−71.7%
170−180
+71.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−70.9%
200−210
+70.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−66.7%
130−140
+66.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
−75.9%
190−200
+75.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
Valorant 240−250
−62.6%
400−450
+62.6%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−66.7%
130−140
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%

This is how RX 8060S and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 75% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 76% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.97 67.89
Recency 6 January 2025 11 August 2025

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 78.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 8060S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.